sandwich: taste cut in half

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste cut in half 1.00
cut taste 0.93
taste cut 0.93
cut in half 0.92
taste better cut 0.91
cut taste better 0.91
taste cut into quarters 0.90
taste cut into triangles 0.80
has state cut 0.80
taste good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cheeseburger, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cheeseburger, taste good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cheeseburger, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut in half)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut in half)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sandwich, has state cut)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cheeseburger, taste good)