baker: use science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.57
, job
Weight: 0.57
, distributor
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, merchant
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cook
Weight: 0.33
, chef
Weight: 0.33
, caterer
Weight: 0.33
, grocer
Weight: 0.33
, waiter
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use science 1.00
use math 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chef, use math)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chef, use science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(chef, use science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chef, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(chef, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(baker, use science)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(baker, use math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(baker, use math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(baker, use math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(baker, use math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(baker, use science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(baker, use science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chef, use science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(baker, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(chef, use math)