bald eagle: be at central idaho

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raptor
Weight: 0.71
, eagle
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, black bear
Weight: 0.66
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, unicorn
Weight: 0.36
, raven
Weight: 0.35
, owl
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at central idaho 1.00
be at northern california 0.80
be at west texas 0.78
be at north american forest 0.78
be at south carolina 0.78
be at oklahoma 0.77
be at southern california desert 0.77
be at washington state 0.77
be at wisconsin 0.77
be at south america 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at central idaho)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at southern california desert)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at central idaho)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lizard, be at southern california desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at southern california desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at central idaho)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at northern california)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at wisconsin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at northern california)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at wisconsin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at northern california)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at northern california)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at wisconsin)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at wisconsin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at central idaho)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at central idaho)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(black bear, be at north american forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, be at southern california desert)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(bald eagle, be at central idaho) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(black bear, be at north american forest)