black bear: be at north american forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bear
Weight: 0.86
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.81
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, brown bear
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bald eagle
Weight: 0.66
, polar bear
Weight: 0.41
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, elephant
Weight: 0.36
, rhino
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at north american forest 1.00
be at northern forest of north america 0.92
be at mountain of north america 0.87
be at western north america 0.86
be at american mountain 0.85
be at in forest 0.81
be at forest 0.80
be at mountanous forest 0.80
be at south lake tahoe 0.80
be at coastal area of alaska 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(black bear, be at north american forest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(black bear, be at north american forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bear, be at in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at south lake tahoe)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at western north america)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(elephant, be at forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at mountain of north america)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at forest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at mountain of north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at mountain of north america)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(elephant, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(elephant, be at forest)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at western north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at western north america)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at south lake tahoe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at south lake tahoe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(black bear, be at north american forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(black bear, be at north american forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at in forest)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at mountain of north america)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at western north america)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at south lake tahoe)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(elephant, be at forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at in forest)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)