bear: be at in forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.66
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, big dipper
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in forest 1.00
be at forest 0.99
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.87
be at north american forest 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at in forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at in forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at in forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bear, be at in forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bear, be at in forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bear, be at in forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(bear, be at in forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at in forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(black bear, be at north american forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bear, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)