ballast: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weight
Weight: 0.63
, device
Weight: 0.60
, electronic device
Weight: 0.53
, electronics
Weight: 0.52
, light source
Weight: 0.51
Siblings vacuum tube
Weight: 0.33
, cathode ray tube
Weight: 0.32
, thermistor
Weight: 0.32
, cooling device
Weight: 0.32
, rectifier
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
is too bad 0.84
have bad days 0.82
be bad in school 0.81
feel good 0.80
is terrible 0.79
has quality bad 0.79
do 0.78
be bad for environment 0.77
running good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(electronics, be bad in school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ballast, go bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ballast, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad in school)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad in school)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(rectifier, go bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(electronics, be bad in school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ballast, go bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ballast, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(rectifier, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(rectifier, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(ballast, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ballast, do)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ballast, do)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ballast, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ballast, do)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(ballast, has quality bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballast, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ballast, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad in school)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(rectifier, go bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad in school)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)