electronics: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.69
, merchandise
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, sector
Weight: 0.61
Siblings solar cell
Weight: 0.65
, resistor
Weight: 0.55
, ballast
Weight: 0.52
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
affect environment 0.87
has quality bad 0.80
is ungiven good 0.78
affect climate change 0.78
pollute environment 0.78
go bad 0.77
has quality good 0.77
impact environment in france 0.75
have bad days 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(merchandise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(industry, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(industry, impact environment in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(industry, affect climate change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(industry, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(industry, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(industry, pollute environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(industry, affect climate change)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(industry, impact environment in france)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(merchandise, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(industry, affect environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(industry, affect climate change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(industry, pollute environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(merchandise, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(industry, impact environment in france)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ballast, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballast, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(resistor, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(industry, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(industry, affect climate change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(merchandise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(industry, pollute environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(industry, impact environment in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballast, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ballast, go bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ballast, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ballast, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(resistor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(resistor, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronics, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(electronics, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(industry, affect environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(industry, pollute environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(industry, affect climate change)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(merchandise, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(industry, impact environment in france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ballast, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ballast, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(resistor, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(industry, affect environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(industry, pollute environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(industry, affect climate change)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(industry, impact environment in france)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(merchandise, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(electronics, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)