electronics: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.69
, merchandise
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, sector
Weight: 0.61
Siblings solar cell
Weight: 0.65
, resistor
Weight: 0.55
, ballast
Weight: 0.52
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is ungiven good 0.87
has quality standard 0.83
has quality news 0.79
be bad for environment 0.77
has quality questions 0.76
has quality virtue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(merchandise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(industry, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(industry, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(merchandise, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality standard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(merchandise, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(resistor, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ballast, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ballast, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(resistor, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(merchandise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(industry, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(industry, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronics, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(resistor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(resistor, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ballast, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ballast, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ballast, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ballast, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(resistor, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(resistor, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(electronics, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(electronics, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(merchandise, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(industry, has quality virtue)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ballast, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(resistor, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ballast, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(resistor, has quality questions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(merchandise, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(electronics, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(industry, has quality virtue)