industry: has quality virtue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.70
, publication
Weight: 0.62
, ministry
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.83
, banking industry
Weight: 0.80
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, aviation
Weight: 0.70
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality virtue 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ministry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(industry, has quality virtue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(industry, has quality virtue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ministry, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ministry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(industry, has quality virtue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(industry, has quality virtue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ministry, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ministry, has quality good)