gift: is ungiven good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gesture
Weight: 0.69
, blessing
Weight: 0.66
, surprise
Weight: 0.63
, donation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings candy
Weight: 0.69
, kindness
Weight: 0.68
, dinner
Weight: 0.66
, compassion
Weight: 0.66
, free will
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is ungiven good 1.00
is good quality 0.90
is good thing 0.89
is bad for 0.89
has quality good 0.87
look good 0.86
is bad thing 0.84
has quality bad 0.83
is good value 0.81
is best 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gesture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(gesture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(donation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(surprise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(donation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(donation, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(surprise, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(donation, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(gesture, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(gesture, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(donation, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(gesture, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(gesture, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(surprise, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(donation, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(candy, is bad for)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(compassion, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(compassion, is bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(compassion, is good value)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(dinner, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kindness, is good quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(kindness, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(free will, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(compassion, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gesture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(gesture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(donation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(surprise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(donation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(candy, is bad for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(candy, is bad for)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(free will, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(free will, is good thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(compassion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(compassion, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(compassion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(compassion, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(compassion, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(compassion, is bad thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dinner, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(dinner, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(candy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(candy, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(free will, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(free will, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(candy, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kindness, is good quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(kindness, is good quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(compassion, is good value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(compassion, is good value)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(kindness, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(kindness, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(dinner, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(dinner, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(gift, is ungiven good)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(gift, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(donation, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(surprise, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(donation, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(compassion, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(compassion, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(compassion, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(candy, is bad for)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(compassion, is good value)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(candy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(free will, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dinner, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(kindness, is good quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dinner, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(kindness, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(free will, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(candy, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(surprise, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(donation, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(donation, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality bad)