ballet dancer: have flat chests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.62
, woman
Weight: 0.52
, dancer
Weight: 0.51
, student
Weight: 0.46
Siblings ballerina
Weight: 0.36
, pianist
Weight: 0.36
, musician
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have flat chests 1.00
have small chests 0.93
has physical part chests 0.91
is flat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have flat chests)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dancer, have small chests)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have flat chests)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, is flat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have flat chests)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ballerina, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(ballerina, have flat chests)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ballerina, is flat)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(ballerina, is flat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(ballet dancer, have flat chests)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have small chests)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(ballet dancer, have small chests)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, is flat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, is flat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(ballet dancer, is flat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have small chests)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have small chests)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, is flat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have flat chests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dancer, have small chests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ballerina, have flat chests)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ballerina, is flat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dancer, have small chests)