dancer: have small chests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.73
, woman
Weight: 0.63
, athlete
Weight: 0.63
, musician
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ballerina
Weight: 0.79
, ballet dancer
Weight: 0.51
, barre
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
have small chests 1.00
have flat chests 0.93
have long necks 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have small chests)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have flat chests)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have long necks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have long necks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ballerina, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(ballerina, have flat chests)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have small chests)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have long necks)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(ballerina, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ballerina, have long necks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(dancer, have small chests)

Similarity expansion

0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dancer, have long necks)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dancer, have long necks)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have long necks)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(dancer, have long necks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dancer, have small chests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have small chests)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ballerina, have flat chests)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have flat chests)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ballerina, have long necks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have long necks)