band: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, ensemble
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.61
, scene
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sonic youth
Weight: 0.73
, orchestra
Weight: 0.72
, rubber band
Weight: 0.70
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.69
, jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality right 0.88
taste bad 0.80
has quality joke 0.80
go bad 0.79
sound bad 0.79
look bad 0.79
sound bad live 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(act, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(scene, look bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(act, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(act, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(scene, look bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(scene, look bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rubber band, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rubber band, taste bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rubber band, has quality joke)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(orchestra, has quality right)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(band, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(band, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(band, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(act, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(band, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(band, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(scene, look bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(band, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(orchestra, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(orchestra, has quality right)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rubber band, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(rubber band, go bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(rubber band, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(rubber band, taste bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(rubber band, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rubber band, has quality joke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(band, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(band, sound bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(band, sound bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(band, sound bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(band, sound bad live)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(band, sound bad live)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(band, sound bad live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(band, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(band, sound bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(band, sound bad live)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(band, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(band, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(act, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(scene, look bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(rubber band, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(orchestra, has quality right)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rubber band, taste bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rubber band, has quality joke)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(act, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(scene, look bad)