act: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.62
, program
Weight: 0.61
, bill
Weight: 0.61
, emergency
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sacrifice
Weight: 0.64
, sonic youth
Weight: 0.63
, adultery
Weight: 0.63
, murder
Weight: 0.62
, indecent exposure
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
have many bad reviews on google 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sacrifice, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(murder, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(sacrifice, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(act, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(act, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(sacrifice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sacrifice, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(adultery, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(adultery, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(murder, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(murder, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(sacrifice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sacrifice, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(act, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(act, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(act, have many bad reviews on google)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(act, have many bad reviews on google)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(act, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(act, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(act, have many bad reviews on google)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(act, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(act, have many bad reviews on google)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(sacrifice, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(murder, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(indecent exposure, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sacrifice, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)