indecent exposure: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.66
, charge
Weight: 0.64
, act
Weight: 0.62
, law
Weight: 0.55
, sex
Weight: 0.54
Siblings sexual harassment
Weight: 0.36
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.33
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sex, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(indecent exposure, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(indecent exposure, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(indecent exposure, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(act, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sex, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sex, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sex, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(indecent exposure, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(indecent exposure, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sex, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sex, has quality bad)