cruelty: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, kindness
Weight: 0.57
, sin
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.62
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.36
, torture
Weight: 0.34
, arson
Weight: 0.34
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
affect quality of life 0.79
be considered bad 0.78
was bad during great depression 0.76
has quality sin 0.76
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(sin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(sin, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sin, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sin, has quality sin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sin)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(arson, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(torture, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(sin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(sin, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(starvation, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(torture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(torture, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(arson, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arson, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cruelty, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sin, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sin, has quality sin)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(torture, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(arson, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(starvation, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sin, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sin, has quality sin)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)