sexual harassment: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual assault
Weight: 0.77
, complaint
Weight: 0.70
, crime
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.69
Siblings flirting
Weight: 0.54
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.39
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.38
, rape
Weight: 0.37
, bullying
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
get bad 0.83
be good 0.82
affect quality 0.81
feel bad 0.80
has quality full 0.80
has quality evil 0.80
affect quality of life 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(complaint, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(complaint, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(complaint, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(complaint, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rape, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(complaint, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(complaint, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(flirting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(flirting, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bullying, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(flirting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(flirting, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(bullying, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality wrong)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(rape, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(rape, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(complaint, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(complaint, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(flirting, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(flirting, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rape, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(complaint, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(complaint, be good)