bullying: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.66
, action
Weight: 0.60
, act
Weight: 0.60
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sexual harassment
Weight: 0.36
, bully
Weight: 0.35
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33
, aggression
Weight: 0.33
, cheating
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
has quality full 0.80
is terrible 0.77
feel good 0.76
has quality definition 0.75
have many bad reviews on google 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(act, have many bad reviews on google) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(act, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(act, have many bad reviews on google)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(act, have many bad reviews on google)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(aggression, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cheating, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(aggression, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(aggression, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cheating, feel good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cheating, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cheating, is terrible)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cheating, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(act, have many bad reviews on google) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cheating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cheating, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(aggression, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(aggression, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cheating, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cheating, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cheating, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cheating, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(aggression, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(aggression, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(aggression, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(aggression, has quality wrong)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cheating, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cheating, is terrible)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cheating, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cheating, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(bullying, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality good)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(bullying, has quality good)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality wrong)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bullying, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(bullying, feel good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bullying, feel good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(bullying, has quality wrong)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bullying, feel good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(act, have many bad reviews on google)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(aggression, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cheating, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cheating, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cheating, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cheating, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(aggression, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cheating, is terrible)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aggression, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(act, have many bad reviews on google)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)