behavior: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.63
, act
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.71
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68
, altruism
Weight: 0.68
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality wrong 0.87
be beneficial quality have 0.81
affect water quality 0.78
has quality effects 0.76
is good thing 0.75
have many bad reviews on google 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(act, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(act, have many bad reviews on google) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(act, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(act, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(act, have many bad reviews on google)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(act, have many bad reviews on google)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(altruism, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(altruism, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be beneficial quality have)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(altruism, is good thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality effects)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(act, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(act, have many bad reviews on google) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(altruism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(altruism, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(altruism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(altruism, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(altruism, be beneficial quality have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(altruism, be beneficial quality have)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cigarette smoking, has quality effects)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(altruism, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(altruism, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(behavior, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(act, has quality better)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(act, have many bad reviews on google)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(altruism, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(altruism, be beneficial quality have)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cigarette smoking, has quality effects)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(altruism, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(altruism, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(act, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(act, have many bad reviews on google)