crime: affect quality of life

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect quality of life 1.00
affect quality 0.93
be important to life 0.85
affect environment 0.82
affect business 0.81
affect on business 0.81
affect people 0.80
has quality good 0.79
has quality better 0.79
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(action, be important to life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(attack, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(action, be important to life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(action, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(action, be important to life)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(action, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arson, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(arson, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(action, be important to life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(attack, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(arson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(arson, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(arson, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arson, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(crime, affect quality of life)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, affect people)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(crime, affect people)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(crime, affect people)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(crime, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(action, be important to life)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(arson, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(arson, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(action, be important to life)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)