attack: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.60
, command
Weight: 0.60
, atrocity
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
Siblings blast
Weight: 0.63
, assault
Weight: 0.62
, counterattack
Weight: 0.62
, shooting
Weight: 0.61
, strike
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality wrong 0.87
make bad 0.82
is terrible 0.77
have really bad tracking 0.76
has quality spot 0.76
has quality sin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(command, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(command, is terrible)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(command, is terrible)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(strike, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(strike, make bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(strike, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(shooting, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality sin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shooting, has quality sin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(command, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(assault, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(shooting, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(shooting, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(strike, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(strike, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(assault, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(strike, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(strike, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(assault, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality wrong)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(strike, make bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(strike, make bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(assault, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality sin)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(shooting, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shooting, has quality sin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(attack, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(attack, has quality good)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(attack, has quality better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality spot)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(attack, has quality spot)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality spot)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(attack, has quality spot)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(attack, have really bad tracking)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(attack, have really bad tracking)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(attack, have really bad tracking)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(attack, have really bad tracking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(command, is terrible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(assault, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strike, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(strike, make bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(strike, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(shooting, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assault, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(assault, has quality sin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(assault, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shooting, has quality sin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(command, is terrible)