attack: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.60
, command
Weight: 0.60
, atrocity
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
Siblings blast
Weight: 0.63
, assault
Weight: 0.62
, counterattack
Weight: 0.62
, shooting
Weight: 0.61
, strike
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
has quality wrong 0.83
has quality spot 0.77
make us stronger 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(challenge, make us stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(challenge, make us stronger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, make us stronger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(strike, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(strike, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(shooting, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(challenge, make us stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(shooting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(shooting, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(strike, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(strike, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(strike, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(strike, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(assault, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(attack, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(attack, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality spot)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(attack, has quality spot)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality spot)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(attack, has quality spot)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(attack, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(challenge, make us stronger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(assault, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(strike, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strike, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(shooting, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assault, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(assault, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(challenge, make us stronger)