assault: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents felony
Weight: 0.63
, attack
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
, charge
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sexual assault
Weight: 0.70
, rape
Weight: 0.36
, robbery
Weight: 0.35
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.35
, manslaughter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality worse 0.87
has quality wrong 0.87
feel bad 0.80
has quality news 0.80
has quality evil 0.80
is bad if 0.79
CAN good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assault, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assault, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assault, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(attack, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assault, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(felony, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality news)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rape, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(attack, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(rape, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(rape, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(robbery, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(robbery, has quality news)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(assault, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(assault, has quality good)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality good)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(assault, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(assault, has quality wrong)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(assault, has quality wrong)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality wrong)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assault, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(robbery, has quality news)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rape, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(assault, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)