robbery: has quality worse

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motive
Weight: 0.64
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, sexual assault
Weight: 0.62
, violence
Weight: 0.59
, felony
Weight: 0.54
Siblings kidnapping
Weight: 0.36
, murder
Weight: 0.36
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.36
, homicide
Weight: 0.36
, rape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worse 1.00
get worse 0.90
has quality bad 0.87
has quality good 0.84
be worse than death 0.83
has quality wrong 0.82
be against women worse 0.82
be worse than beating 0.80
be worse than rape 0.79
be much worse than non-sexual assault 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(violence, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(violence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(robbery, has quality worse)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(violence, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(violence, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(violence, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality wrong)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(felony, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(homicide, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rape, be worse than beating)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(homicide, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rape, be worse than death)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rape, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(rape, be much worse than non-sexual assault)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(murder, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(murder, be worse than rape)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(murder, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(violence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(violence, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(kidnapping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(kidnapping, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(murder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(murder, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(homicide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(homicide, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(murder, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(murder, has quality wrong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(kidnapping, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(kidnapping, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(murder, be worse than rape)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(murder, be worse than rape)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(homicide, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(homicide, has quality wrong)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(rape, be worse than death)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rape, be worse than death)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rape, be worse than beating)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(rape, be worse than beating)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(rape, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(rape, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(rape, be much worse than non-sexual assault)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rape, be much worse than non-sexual assault)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(robbery, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(robbery, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(violence, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(violence, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(violence, has quality wrong)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(homicide, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(kidnapping, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(kidnapping, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(murder, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(murder, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(homicide, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rape, be worse than beating)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rape, be worse than death)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(murder, be worse than rape)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rape, has quality wrong)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rape, be much worse than non-sexual assault)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(violence, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(violence, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(violence, has quality wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)