violence: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.68
, tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, crime
Weight: 0.63
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.62
Siblings poverty
Weight: 0.67
, fire
Weight: 0.62
, robbery
Weight: 0.59
, killing
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
be considered bad 0.78
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(violence, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fire, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(killing, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(killing, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(violence, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(killing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(killing, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(killing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(killing, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(killing, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(killing, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fire, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fire, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(killing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(killing, feel good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(killing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(killing, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(violence, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(violence, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(violence, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(violence, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(violence, has quality wrong)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(violence, has quality wrong)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(violence, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality wrong)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(violence, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(violence, be considered bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(violence, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(violence, be considered bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(violence, be considered bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(violence, feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(violence, be considered bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(violence, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(violence, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(killing, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fire, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(killing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(killing, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(killing, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(killing, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)