crime: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality wrong 0.87
get bad 0.83
affect quality 0.81
affect quality of life 0.79
be considered bad 0.78
have really bad tracking 0.76
has quality spot 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(attack, have really bad tracking)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(attack, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(attack, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality spot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(attack, have really bad tracking)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality spot)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(attack, have really bad tracking)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arson, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(arson, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(arson, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(attack, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(attack, have really bad tracking)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(attack, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(arson, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(arson, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(arson, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arson, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(arson, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(arson, has quality wrong)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(crime, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(crime, affect quality of life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(attack, has quality spot)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(attack, have really bad tracking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(arson, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(arson, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(arson, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(attack, has quality spot)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(attack, have really bad tracking)