pedophilia: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality right 0.88
has quality bad 0.87
be considered wrong 0.86
has quality good 0.85
be to animals wrong 0.83
is morally wrong 0.80
is inherently wrong 0.80
be universally considered wrong 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(evil, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality right)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(adultery, be universally considered wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, be to animals wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is morally wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(evil, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(adultery, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality right)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(adultery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality wrong)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(adultery, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(adultery, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cruelty, be to animals wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cruelty, be to animals wrong)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(adultery, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(adultery, is morally wrong)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(adultery, be universally considered wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(adultery, be universally considered wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pedophilia, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered wrong)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered wrong)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered wrong)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered wrong)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(evil, has quality wrong)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality right)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cruelty, be to animals wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(adultery, be universally considered wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(adultery, is morally wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(evil, has quality wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)