pornography: has quality wrong

Related concepts

Parents	crime Weight: 0.64 , image Weight: 0.62 , behavior Weight: 0.62 , addiction Weight: 0.61 , movie Weight: 0.60
Siblings	pedophilia Weight: 0.36 , sexual harassment Weight: 0.35 , sexual activity Weight: 0.35 , indecent exposure Weight: 0.34 , gambling Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality wrong	1.00
has quality bad	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(pornography, has quality wrong)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(pornography, has quality wrong)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(addiction, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(pornography, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(addiction, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(addiction, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(addiction, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(pornography, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(pornography, has quality bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(pornography, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(pornography, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(addiction, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(gambling, has quality wrong)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(indecent exposure, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(addiction, has quality bad)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)