pedophilia: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality right 0.88
has quality wrong 0.87
get bad 0.83
affect quality 0.81
has quality evil 0.80
have taste good 0.79
is bad thing 0.79
affect quality of life 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(evil, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(evil, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, have taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, have taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, have taste good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality right)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality evil)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(evil, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(evil, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, have taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(adultery, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(adultery, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(adultery, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality right)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(adultery, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(adultery, is bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(adultery, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality evil)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(adultery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality wrong)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(pedophilia, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, have taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, has quality evil)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(evil, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality right)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(adultery, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality evil)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, have taste good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, has quality evil)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(evil, has quality wrong)