evil: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, theme
Weight: 0.58
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.57
Siblings corruption
Weight: 0.64
, masturbation
Weight: 0.63
, segregation
Weight: 0.61
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.60
, inequality
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality wrong 0.85
be superior to good 0.84
have taste good 0.81
has quality evil 0.78
be more attractive than good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(segregation, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(segregation, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(segregation, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality evil)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(segregation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(segregation, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(segregation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(segregation, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(segregation, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(segregation, has quality wrong)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(masturbation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(masturbation, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(masturbation, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(masturbation, has quality evil)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(masturbation, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(masturbation, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(evil, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, be superior to good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(evil, be superior to good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, be superior to good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, have taste good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(evil, have taste good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, have taste good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(evil, be more attractive than good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, have taste good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(evil, be superior to good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(evil, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, has quality evil)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(evil, has quality wrong)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality wrong)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(evil, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality evil)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(evil, has quality evil)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality evil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(segregation, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(segregation, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(masturbation, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(segregation, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(masturbation, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(masturbation, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)