gambling: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
has quality good 0.85
has quality worth 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(diversion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(habit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(habit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality wrong)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(addiction, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(habit, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diversion, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(habit, has quality worth)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(addiction, has quality bad)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(poker, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(betting, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(diversion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(habit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(addiction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(betting, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(betting, has quality wrong)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(betting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(betting, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(betting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(betting, has quality good)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(gambling, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(gambling, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(gambling, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality good)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(addiction, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(habit, has quality worth)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(habit, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality bad)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(betting, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(betting, has quality bad)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(addiction, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(habit, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(habit, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality bad)
...