diversion: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.58
, project
Weight: 0.55
Siblings gambling
Weight: 0.59
, booze
Weight: 0.51
, television program
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
has quality wrong 0.87
affect water quality 0.78
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(program, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(television program, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(gambling, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diversion, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diversion, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diversion, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diversion, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diversion, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(television program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(television program, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gambling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(gambling, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(gambling, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(diversion, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(diversion, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(diversion, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(television program, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(gambling, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, is quality)