gambling: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, addiction
Weight: 0.61
, habit
Weight: 0.61
, diversion
Weight: 0.59
Siblings betting
Weight: 0.35
, poker
Weight: 0.35
, pornography
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
get bad 0.83
has quality worth 0.82
affect quality 0.81
affect quality of life 0.79
affect water quality 0.78
has quality prices 0.77
was bad during great depression 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(diversion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(habit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(habit, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(habit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(addiction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(addiction, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(habit, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diversion, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(diversion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(habit, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(habit, has quality prices)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diversion, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(addiction, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(poker, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(betting, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(betting, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(betting, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(diversion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(habit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(diversion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(addiction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(habit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(habit, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(betting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(betting, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pornography, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(betting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(betting, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(poker, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(poker, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(betting, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(betting, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(gambling, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(gambling, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality wrong)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(gambling, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gambling, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(addiction, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(habit, has quality worth)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(habit, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(habit, has quality prices)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(betting, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(poker, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(betting, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(betting, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(addiction, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(habit, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(diversion, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(habit, has quality worth)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gambling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(habit, has quality prices)