pedophilia: is inherently wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is inherently wrong 1.00
be considered wrong 0.85
is morally wrong 0.84
be universally considered wrong 0.82
has quality wrong 0.80
be to animals wrong 0.78
is socially legally unacceptable 0.76
is socially unacceptable 0.76
be considered morally repugnant 0.76
is basically illegal 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(evil, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(adultery, be universally considered wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(adultery, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is morally wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, be to animals wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(evil, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(adultery, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(adultery, is morally wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cruelty, be to animals wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cruelty, be to animals wrong)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(adultery, be universally considered wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(adultery, be universally considered wrong)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(adultery, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(adultery, has quality wrong)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pornography, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pornography, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered wrong)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered wrong)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered wrong)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is basically illegal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered wrong)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is basically illegal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is basically illegal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is basically illegal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pedophilia, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(evil, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cruelty, be to animals wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(adultery, be universally considered wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(adultery, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(adultery, is morally wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pornography, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(evil, has quality wrong)