pedophilia: is socially legally unacceptable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is socially legally unacceptable 1.00
is socially unacceptable 0.95
is legally unacceptable 0.95
is unacceptable 0.84
be considered morally repugnant 0.83
is morally wrong 0.83
is acceptable 0.80
is immoral 0.78
be thought socially constructed 0.77
is inherently wrong 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(crime, be thought socially constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(crime, be thought socially constructed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(crime, be thought socially constructed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is morally wrong)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is acceptable)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(crime, be thought socially constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(adultery, is acceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(adultery, is acceptable)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(adultery, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(adultery, is morally wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(crime, be thought socially constructed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(adultery, is acceptable)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cruelty, is immoral)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(adultery, is morally wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(crime, be thought socially constructed)