cruelty: is immoral

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, kindness
Weight: 0.57
, sin
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.62
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.36
, torture
Weight: 0.34
, arson
Weight: 0.34
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is immoral 1.00
is inhumane 0.78
be unethical behaviour in workplace 0.78
is inhuman 0.78
is socially legally unacceptable 0.78
is unacceptable 0.78
is legally unacceptable 0.77
is illegal 0.77
is unjustifiable 0.76
is unlawful 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unlawful)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(torture, is immoral)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is illegal)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(arson, is illegal)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(torture, is unjustifiable)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(torture, is illegal)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(torture, is inhuman)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(torture, is inhumane)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(torture, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(torture, is immoral)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(torture, is inhumane)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(torture, is inhumane)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(torture, is inhuman)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(torture, is inhuman)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(torture, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(torture, is illegal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pedophilia, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is illegal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(arson, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(arson, is illegal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(torture, is unjustifiable)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(torture, is unjustifiable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unlawful)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is unlawful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cruelty, is immoral)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cruelty, is immoral)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(torture, is inhumane)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(torture, is inhuman)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(torture, is immoral)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(torture, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(arson, is illegal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(torture, is unjustifiable)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is unlawful)