pedophilia: is socially unacceptable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is socially unacceptable 1.00
is socially legally unacceptable 0.95
is unacceptable 0.90
is legally unacceptable 0.89
be considered morally repugnant 0.82
is acceptable 0.81
is morally wrong 0.80
is immoral 0.79
be considered repugnant 0.77
be thought socially constructed 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(crime, be thought socially constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(crime, be thought socially constructed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(crime, be thought socially constructed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is morally wrong)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is acceptable)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(crime, be thought socially constructed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(adultery, is acceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(adultery, is acceptable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(adultery, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(adultery, is morally wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(crime, be thought socially constructed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(adultery, is acceptable)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cruelty, is immoral)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(adultery, is morally wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(crime, be thought socially constructed)