pedophilia: be considered morally repugnant

Related concepts

Parents	crime Weight: 0.68 , atrocity Weight: 0.63 , mental disorder Weight: 0.60 , evil Weight: 0.60 , topic Weight: 0.57
Siblings	pornography Weight: 0.36 , sexual harassment Weight: 0.35 , adultery Weight: 0.34 , obsessive compulsive disorder Weight: 0.34 , cruelty Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered morally repugnant	1.00
be considered repugnant	0.95
is morally wrong	0.90
is immoral	0.84
is socially legally unacceptable	0.83
is socially unacceptable	0.82
is legally unacceptable	0.80
is unethical	0.79
is inherently wrong	0.76
is moral	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(adultery, is morally wrong)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(adultery, is moral)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(adultery, is morally wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(adultery, is morally wrong)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(adultery, is moral) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(adultery, is moral)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(pedophilia, is inherently wrong)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(cruelty, is immoral)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is unethical)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(adultery, is moral)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(adultery, is morally wrong)