starvation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cruelty
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.61
, cause
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.54
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.35
, hunger
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, dehydration
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality change 0.86
has quality damn 0.83
be bad for world 0.82
is bad thing 0.79
feel good 0.76
is good thing 0.75
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(starvation, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hunger, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(famine, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(starvation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(famine, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(famine, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dehydration, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dehydration, has quality change)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(dehydration, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dehydration, is bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hunger, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hunger, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(starvation, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(starvation, is bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(starvation, is bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(starvation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hunger, has quality damn)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dehydration, is bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hunger, feel good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dehydration, has quality change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(famine, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dehydration, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(starvation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)