hunger: has quality damn

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality damn 1.00
is damn fast 0.86
has quality good 0.84
has quality bad 0.83
is good quality 0.83
be damn attractive to women 0.82
is quality 0.81
has quality wrong 0.80
is good thing 0.78
has quality worse 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(desire, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hunger, has quality damn)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(desire, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hunger, has quality damn)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hunger, has quality damn)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(desire, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(desire, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(desire, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(desire, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(thirst, has quality damn)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ambition, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(thirst, is damn fast)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(ambition, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(famine, has quality bad)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(desire, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(desire, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(thirst, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(thirst, has quality damn)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ambition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ambition, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(ambition, is quality)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ambition, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(ambition, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(ambition, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(starvation, has quality bad)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hunger, has quality damn)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hunger, is damn fast)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hunger, is damn fast)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(hunger, is damn fast)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is damn fast)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hunger, has quality damn)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(desire, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(desire, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(thirst, has quality damn)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ambition, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(ambition, is quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ambition, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(thirst, is damn fast)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(desire, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(desire, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(hunger, has quality damn)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)