dehydration: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.67
, cause
Weight: 0.66
, condition
Weight: 0.64
, symptom
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.62
Siblings pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.36
, hypoglycemia
Weight: 0.36
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.35
, exhaustion
Weight: 0.35
, blood poisoning
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
has quality change 0.86
is bad people 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
has quality question 0.76
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dehydration, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dehydration, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hypoglycemia, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(hypoglycemia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(hypoglycemia, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pneumonia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pneumonia, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(dehydration, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(dehydration, has quality change)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality change)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dehydration, has quality change)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dehydration, has quality change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dehydration, is bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(dehydration, is bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dehydration, is bad thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dehydration, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hypoglycemia, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pneumonia, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(dehydration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)