pulmonary edema: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.75
, condition
Weight: 0.70
, disease
Weight: 0.68
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, lung
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pulmonary embolism
Weight: 0.40
, myocardial infarction
Weight: 0.39
, edema
Weight: 0.39
, pleural effusion
Weight: 0.39
, pneumothorax
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(edema, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(edema, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(edema, has quality bad)