pulmonary embolism: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents embolism
Weight: 0.81
, blood clot
Weight: 0.76
, complication
Weight: 0.71
, clot
Weight: 0.70
, condition
Weight: 0.70
Siblings pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.40
, pneumothorax
Weight: 0.38
, atrial fibrillation
Weight: 0.38
, pleural effusion
Weight: 0.37
, peritonitis
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
is bad people 0.80
hurt bad 0.77
has quality question 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(clot, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(embolism, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(blood clot, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(embolism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(embolism, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(embolism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(clot, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(embolism, has quality worse)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(blood clot, hurt bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(embolism, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(clot, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(embolism, has quality worse)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(embolism, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, hurt bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(peritonitis, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(clot, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(embolism, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(embolism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(blood clot, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(peritonitis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(peritonitis, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(embolism, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(embolism, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(blood clot, hurt bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(clot, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(embolism, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(peritonitis, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(embolism, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(embolism, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(clot, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(embolism, has quality worse)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(blood clot, hurt bad)