atrial fibrillation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.75
, blood clot
Weight: 0.73
, heart disease
Weight: 0.73
, abnormality
Weight: 0.70
, rhythm
Weight: 0.69
Siblings myocardial infarction
Weight: 0.39
, ventricular fibrillation
Weight: 0.39
, coronary artery
Weight: 0.38
, pulmonary embolism
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
hurt bad 0.77
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rhythm, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rhythm, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(blood clot, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(heart disease, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(rhythm, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rhythm, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(blood clot, hurt bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heart disease, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rhythm, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhythm, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, hurt bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ventricular fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rhythm, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rhythm, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(heart disease, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(blood clot, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ventricular fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ventricular fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rhythm, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rhythm, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(blood clot, hurt bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ventricular fibrillation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rhythm, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rhythm, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(blood clot, hurt bad)