pleural effusion: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.72
, symptom
Weight: 0.64
, abnormality
Weight: 0.64
, disease
Weight: 0.60
, infection
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.39
, pneumothorax
Weight: 0.38
, myocardial infarction
Weight: 0.38
, pulmonary embolism
Weight: 0.37
, pyelonephritis
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
has quality question 0.76
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(infection, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(infection, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pleural effusion, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)