complication: has quality question

Related concepts

Parents	problem Weight: 0.67 , factor Weight: 0.57 , issue Weight: 0.57 , aspect Weight: 0.54
Siblings	congestive heart failure Weight: 0.75 , pulmonary edema Weight: 0.75 , myocardial infarction Weight: 0.74 , pneumothorax Weight: 0.74 , pelvic inflammatory disease Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality question	1.00
asked questions	0.80
has quality good	0.77
has quality bad	0.76
answer key	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(issue, asked questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(problem, answer key) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(issue, asked questions)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(problem, answer key)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(problem, answer key)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(issue, asked questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(issue, asked questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(problem, answer key) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(complication, has quality question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(issue, asked questions)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(problem, answer key)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(issue, asked questions)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(problem, answer key)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(complication, has quality question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)