bar stool: be at drunk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bar
Weight: 0.63
, furniture
Weight: 0.61
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.57
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.35
, towel bar
Weight: 0.35
, candy bar
Weight: 0.35
, coffee table
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at drunk 1.00
be used to get drunk 0.97
be used to drink alcohol 0.83
be used to drink 0.81
be used to serve and imbibe alcoholic drink 0.78
be used to sit down while drink beer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bar, be used to drink)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bar stool, be at drunk)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bar, be used to drink alcohol)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bar stool, be at drunk)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bar, be used to get drunk)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bar stool, be at drunk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bar, be used to serve and imbibe alcoholic drink)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bar stool, be at drunk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bar, be used to get drunk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bar, be used to serve and imbibe alcoholic drink)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(bar, be used to drink alcohol)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bar, be used to drink)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bar, be used to get drunk)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bar, be used to drink alcohol)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(bar, be used to drink)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bar, be used to serve and imbibe alcoholic drink)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bar, be used to get drunk)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bar stool, be at drunk)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bar, be used to drink)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bar stool, be at drunk)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bar, be used to drink alcohol)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bar stool, be at drunk)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bar, be used to serve and imbibe alcoholic drink)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bar stool, be at drunk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(bar stool, be at drunk)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bar stool, be used to sit down while drink beer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bar stool, be used to sit down while drink beer)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(bar stool, be used to sit down while drink beer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be used to sit down while drink beer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bar stool, be at drunk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bar, be used to get drunk)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bar, be used to drink alcohol)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(bar, be used to drink)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bar, be used to serve and imbibe alcoholic drink)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bar, be used to get drunk)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bar, be used to drink alcohol)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(bar, be used to drink)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bar stool, be at drunk)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bar, be used to serve and imbibe alcoholic drink)