bar: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, disco
Weight: 0.54
, handlebar
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurant 1.00
be at tavern 0.81
be used to view sushi chef 0.81
be at hotel 0.80
be used to eat sushi 0.78
be find in bar 0.77
be at nightclub 0.77
be used to sushi 0.77
be at kitchen 0.76
be used to enjoy sushi 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(disco, be at hotel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at kitchen)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at tavern)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to sushi)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be find in bar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(bar stool, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(bar stool, be at restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bar stool, be at tavern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(bar stool, be at tavern)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(bar stool, be find in bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(bar stool, be find in bar)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to sushi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to sushi)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(bar stool, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bar stool, be at kitchen)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(disco, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(disco, be at hotel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(bar, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(bar, be used to view sushi chef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(bar, be used to view sushi chef)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(bar, be at nightclub)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at nightclub)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bar, be at nightclub)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bar, be used to view sushi chef)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(bar, be at nightclub)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bar, be used to view sushi chef)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bar, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bar stool, be at restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to sushi)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bar stool, be find in bar)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bar stool, be at tavern)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(disco, be at hotel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bar stool, be at kitchen)