japanese restaurant: be used to eat sushi

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.72
, bar
Weight: 0.64
, japan
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, everything
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to eat sushi 1.00
be used to sushi 0.98
be used to enjoy sushi 0.96
be used to view sushi chef 0.90
be used to eat tasty food 0.87
be used to eat pizza 0.86
be used to eat curry food 0.86
be used to eat food 0.85
be used to eat pasta 0.84
be used to eat raviolli 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bar, be used to view sushi chef)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(bar, be used to view sushi chef)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bar, be used to view sushi chef)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat curry food)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bar, be used to view sushi chef)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat curry food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat curry food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to sushi)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to sushi)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to sushi)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to sushi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bar, be used to view sushi chef)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat curry food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to eat sushi)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bar, be used to view sushi chef)