indian restaurant: be used to eat food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, place
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to eat food 1.00
be used to eat to get food 0.98
be used to food 0.94
be used to eat raviolli 0.94
be used to eat 0.94
be used to eat at 0.93
be used to eat tasty food 0.93
be used to eat in 0.93
be at food 0.92
be used to eat meal without cook 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be at food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)